Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on September 17, 2009

Stroke. 2009
Published online before print September 17, 2009, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.559013
A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/11/3493    most recent
STROKEAHA.109.559013v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dankbaar, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by van der Schaaf, I. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dankbaar, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by van der Schaaf, I. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Cerebral Aneurysm, AVM, & Subarachnoid hemorrhage
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Submitted on May 28, 2009
Accepted on August 11, 2009

Diagnosing Delayed Cerebral Ischemia With Different CT Modalities in Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage With Clinical Deterioration

Jan Willem Dankbaar MD*; Nicolien K. de Rooij MD; Birgitta K. Velthuis MD; Catharina J.M. Frijns MD; Gabriel J.E. Rinkel MD; and Irene C. van der Schaaf MD

From the Departments of Radiology (J.W.D., B.K.V., I.C.d.v.S.) and Neurology (N.K.d.R., C.J.M.F., G.J.E.R.), Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neuroscience, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: j.w.dankbaar{at}umcutrecht.nl.

Background and Purpose—Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage worsens the prognosis and is difficult to diagnose. We investigated the diagnostic value of noncontrast CT (NCT), CT perfusion (CTP), and CT angiography (CTA) for DCI after clinical deterioration in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Methods—We prospectively enrolled 42 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage with clinical deterioration suspect for DCI (new focal deficit or Glasgow Coma Scale decrease ≥2 points) within 21 days after hemorrhage. All patients underwent NCT, CTP, and CTA scans on admission and directly after clinical deterioration. The gold standard was the clinical diagnosis DCI made retrospectively by 2 neurologists who interpreted all clinical data, except CTP and CTA, to rule out other causes for the deterioration. Radiologists interpreted NCT and CTP images for signs of ischemia (NCT) or hypoperfusion (CTP) not localized in the neurosurgical trajectory or around intracerebral hematomas, and CTA images for presence of vasospasm. Diagnostic values for DCI of NCT, CTP, and CTA were assessed by calculating sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values with 95% CIs.

Results—In 3 patients with clinical deterioration, imaging failed due to motion artifacts. Of the remaining 39 patients, 25 had DCI and 14 did not. NCT had a sensitivity of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.73), specificity=0.71 (0.57 to 0.77), positive predictive value=0.78 (0.55 to 0.91), negative predictive value=0.48 (0.28 to 0.68); CTP: sensitivity=0.84 (0.65 to 0.94), specificity=0.79 (0.52 to 0.92), positive predictive value=0.88 (0.69 to 0.96), negative predictive value=0.73 (0.48 to 0.89); CTA: sensitivity=0.64 (0.45 to 0.80), specificity=0.50 (0.27 to 0.73), positive predictive value=0.70 (0.49 to 0.84), negative predictive value=0.44 (0.23 to 0.67).

Conclusion—As a diagnostic tool for DCI, qualitative assessment of CTP is overall superior to NCT and CTA and could be useful for fast decision-making and guiding treatment.


Key words: computed tomography • ischemia • perfusion • subarachnoid hemorrhage • vasospasm