(Stroke. 2000;31:2369.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Neurosurgery (T.K., H.H., J.H., M.V.) and Clinical Radiology (R.V., T.S.), Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Correspondence to Timo Koivisto, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, SF-70211 Kuopio, Finland. E-mail timo.koivisto{at}kuh.fi
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MethodsOne hundred nine consecutive patients were randomly assigned to either surgical (n=57) or endovascular (n=52) treatment. Clinical and neuropsychological outcome was assessed at 3 and 12 months after treatment; MRI of the brain was performed at 12 months. Follow-up angiography was scheduled after clipping and 3 and 12 months after endovascular treatment.
ResultsOne year postoperatively, 43/41 (surgical/endovascular) patients had good or moderate recovery, 5/4 had severe disability or were in a vegetative state, and 9/7 had died (NS) according to intention to treat. Patients with good clinical recovery did not differ in their neuropsychological test scores. Symptomatic vasospasm (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.45 to 4.19; P<0.001), poorer Hunt and Hess grade (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.31 to 4.75; P=0.005), need for permanent shunt (OR 8.90; 95% CI 1.80 to 44.15; P=0.008), and larger size of the aneurysm (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.45; P=0.032) independently predicted worsened clinical outcome regardless of the treatment modality. In MRI, superficial brain retraction deficits (P<0.001) and ischemic lesions in the territory of the ruptured aneurysm (P=0.025) were more frequent in the surgical group. Kaplan-Meier analysis (mean±SD follow-up 39±18 months) revealed equal survival in both treatment groups. No late rebleedings have occurred.
ConclusionsOne-year clinical and neuropsychological outcomes seem comparable after early surgical and endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. The long-term efficacy of endovascular treatment in preventing rebleeding remains open.
Key Words: cerebral aneurysm clinical trials embolization, therapeutic subarachnoid hemorrhage surgery
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
No comparative studies of the long-term outcome of surgical versus GDC treatment in acute SAH have been published so far. The objective of this prospective study was to randomly assign patients with acute (<72 hours) aneurysmal SAH to either endovascular treatment or open surgery and to determine the differences between these treatment modalities in long-term clinical (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS]),22 neuropsychological, and radiological (angiographic occlusion rate; MRI of the brain) outcomes. The high incidence of SAH in Finland (16 to 20/100 000 per year),6 our defined catchment area (900 000 people) with no referral bias, and our extensive experience with early surgery2 encouraged us to design and conduct this study.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Neurological status was assessed daily during the first hospitalization. Follow-up angiography was scheduled after surgical clipping during the first hospitalization (and in cases of neck remnant, 12 months after clipping) and 3 and 12 months after endovascular treatment. The evaluation of clinical outcome (GOS) and a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment were scheduled at the time of hospital discharge as well as 3 and 12 months after treatment. MRI of the brain was scheduled 12 months after treatment. The latest outcome data were obtained by telephone interview during April 2000.
Determination Events
The primary end point events were rebleeding of the
aneurysm or death of the patient. The secondary end point event
was refilling of the aneurysm, indicating the need for
additional treatment. The primary outcome events were 12-month
clinical, neuropsychological, and radiological outcomes.
Follow-Up
Clinical outcome at 3 months after treatment was evaluated by
the neurosurgeon primarily responsible for treatment or the principal
investigator (T.K.) of the study. The 12-month outcome was evaluated by
a single neurosurgeon (T.K.). The last outcome data obtained by
telephone interview were evaluated by a single neurosurgeon (T.K.) or
by a single trained nurse.
Neuropsychological assessment was performed by the same neuropsychologist (H.H.) on 3 occasions. The short-term assessment 10 days after treatment was limited to a few tests. Comprehensive evaluation 3 and 12 months after treatment included tests of general intelligence, memory, and selected language abilities and assessment of attention and flexibility of mental processing.24 25 26 27 28 29 In the tests of learning and memory, parallel sets of tests were used to minimize the retest learning effects, and the order of the sets was randomly alternated. A detailed description of the neuropsychological tests is provided in the Appendix.
The achieved angiographic occlusion rate of the aneurysms was evaluated, by consensus, by a neurosurgeon (T.K.) and an interventional neuroradiologist (R.V.).
In MRI, T2- and proton densityweighted transaxial slices of the brain were evaluated by a neuroradiologist (R.V.) and a neurosurgeon (T.K.) by consensus. The following factors were analyzed: (1) the presence, number, and dimensions of ischemic lesions in (a) the vascular territory of the parental artery of the ruptured aneurysm and (b) other vascular territories; (2) traces indicative of mechanical retraction injury; (3) lesions caused by hematoma; (4) lesions already present in the initial CT examination; and (5) ventricular-to-intracranial width ratio.
Statistics
The intention-to-treat analysis compared endovascular
and surgical patients in terms of time to a primary end point event,
using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test. The
corresponding analysis was performed separately for patients in
preoperative Hunt and Hess grades III and grades IIIV. The
influence of the intended treatment modality and different clinical and
anatomic factors on the observed clinical outcome were
analyzed. The Mann-Whitney U test for continuous or
ordinal scale variables with a non-normal distribution, the
2 test for dichotomized discrete
variables, and the Student t test for continuous
variables with a normal distribution were applied for group
comparisons. Changes in scoring between consecutive neuropsychological
tests were analyzed with the paired-samples t test
or the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Differences were considered
to be statistically significant if the 2-tailed P value was
<0.05. Multivariate analysis was performed by
logistic regression to identify potential predictive factors of
12-month outcome (GOS). A stepwise model-building procedure was
performed for the parameters, using P<0.25
achieved in univariate analysis. In the final
multivariate analysis, the statistical level of
significance was set at P<0.05. Significance was calculated
by the likelihood ratio test. The goodness of fit of the model was
estimated with Nagelkerke R2.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twelve-Month Clinical Outcome
The 12-month clinical outcomes (GOS) in the surgical and
endovascular treatment groups did not differ significantly
(P=0.319; Table 2
). Neither
group significantly improved their clinical outcome between 3 and 12
months after treatment.
|
In univariate analysis, the intended treatment modality, gender of the patient, crossover treatment, and multiplicity of the aneurysms were not statistically significant determinant factors of good recovery (GOS). Because Hunt and Hess grade (P<0.001), postoperative symptomatic vasospasm (P<0.001), need for permanent shunt creation (P<0.001), Fisher grade (P=0.001), size of the aneurysm (P=0.003), age (P=0.015), size of the aneurysmal neck (p=0.024), and hydrocephalus in the preoperative CT (P=0.027) were significantly associated with clinical outcome, they were further included in a backward stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis as independent variables. Postoperative symptomatic vasospasm (OR 2.47; 95% CI 1.45 to 4.19; P<0.001), poorer Hunt and Hess grade (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.31 to 4.75; P=0.005), need for permanent shunt creation (OR 8.90; 95% CI 1.80 to 44.15; P=0.008), and larger size of the ruptured aneurysm (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.45; P=0.032) proved to be independent predictors of poorer clinical outcome. For the final model R2=0.514.
Survival Analysis
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (Figure 1
) was based on the last outcome data
obtained by telephone interview. No patients were lost from follow-up.
At the time of the last follow-up, 9 patients in the endovascular group
and 10 patients in the surgical group had died (Table 3
). No rebleedings occurred after the
first hospitalization. There was no significant difference in
cumulative survival times between the endovascular (mean survival time
1575 days; 95% CI 1403 to 1746 days) and surgical (1572 days; 95% CI
1400 to 1745 days) treatment groups (P=0.8822; Figure 1
). The patients with preoperative Hunt and Hess grades III
(1716 days; 95% CI 1600 to 1832 days) had significantly lower risk of
cumulative mortality (P=0.0126) than the patients with
grades IIIV (1344 days; 95% CI 1104 to 1583 days; Figure 2
).
|
|
|
Technique-Related Mortality and Morbidity
The early technique-related morbidity and mortality of
endovascular and surgical treatment in the study population have been
described earlier.23 One patient in the endovascular and 1
patient in the surgical group died after late surgical treatment of a
residual aneurysm (Table 3
).
Neuropsychological Evaluation
The number of patients completing all the neuropsychological
tasks, their ages, gender and years of formal education were equal in
both treatment groups. Only patients who completed all the tasks were
included in the analysis. Of these patients, the number of
patients with moderate or severe disability (GOS) was small and
unequally distributed between the surgical and endovascular groups at
both the 3- (7 versus 3) and 12-month (7 versus 1) assessments. The
number of tasks not performed did not significantly differ between
groups.
Patients with good clinical outcome (GOS) in either treatment group did
not have significant differences in their neuropsychological test
scores, and both groups improved their performance between the
3- and 12-month assessments (Table 4
).
|
Angiographic Results
One residual basilar aneurysm was operated on again after
3 months with lethal complications. Of the 48 surgical patients alive
12 months after primary treatment, 3 (6%) had undergone crossover
treatment, and 2 aneurysms had spontaneously thrombosed.
Of the 45 endovascular patients alive 12 months after primary treatment, 9 (20%) had undergone crossover treatment and 3 (7%) reembolization. In 10 patients (22%) refilling of the aneurysmal neck was present, while in 7 patients (16%) the aneurysmal remnant had thrombosed spontaneously.
Two endovascular patients refused the 12-month angiography. Control
angiography was not performed in 5 patients who had primary or
additional surgical treatment. In 2 cases the result was confirmed at
autopsy; 1 patient developed renal failure, and the result was
evaluated by MRA. One patient died before control angiography and had
no autopsy; 1 patient lacked control angiography after clipping of a
previously embolized aneurysm. The final angiographic
results are presented in Table 5
.
|
MRI of the Brain
Forty-one endovascular and 47 surgical patients
(p=0.808) underwent MRI of the brain 12 months after
treatment (Table 6
). Claustrophobia
prohibited MRI examination in 4 cases, and 2 patients refused.
|
Ischemic lesions in the parental artery territory were associated with clinical symptoms of vasospasm (P=0.001). Ischemic lesions in other locations were associated with clinical symptoms of vasospasm (P<0.001), with higher Fisher grade (P=0.001), and with ischemic lesions in the parental artery territory (P=0.001).
In univariate analysis, the following MRI variables revealed significant association with poorer clinical outcome: size of the ischemic lesion in the parental artery territory (P<0.001) or in another location (P=0.001); presence of an ischemic lesion in the parental artery territory (P=0.003) or in another location (P=0.005); deficit due to preoperative intracerebral hematoma (P=0.035) and higher ventricular-intracranial width ratio (P=0.040). These were included in a backward stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis as independent variables. In the final model, the presence of an ischemic lesion in the parental artery territory (OR 6.20; 95% CI 1.67 to 23.05; P=0.006) and a deficit due to preoperative intracerebral hematoma (OR 4.23; 95% CI 1.16 to 15.39; P=0.029) proved to be independent predictors of poorer clinical outcome. The R2 of the final model was 0.249.
Crossover Between Treatment Groups
Crossover from endovascular to surgical treatment was (n=12)
significantly more common than crossover from surgical to endovascular
treatment (n=4; P=0.028). Eight endovascular patients were
operated on during the primary hospitalization.23 In
4 cases, control angiography revealed that the coils had collapsed so
that a significant portion of the aneurysm was refilling; these
aneurysms were operated on. Altogether, 4 surgical patients had
their significant residual aneurysms treated
endovascularly.
In addition to intention-to-treat analyses, all the analyses of clinical, neuropsychological, and radiological results, as well as the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, were repeated by leaving out the crossover patients. The results did not markedly differ from the original analyses.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The basic characteristics of our patients in both treatment groups were
similar in terms of aneurysm location and size, severity of
subarachnoid bleeding,30 and clinical
grade37 of the patients. These variables are also
comparable to those presented in the international cooperative
study3 4 and in our previous study of 1007
patients,2 with the exception of the large proportion of
excluded middle cerebral artery aneurysms (Table 1
), the
most common aneurysms in our institution.38
Clinical Outcome of the Patients
One-year outcome did not significantly differ between groups, as
79% of endovascular versus 75% of surgical patients had good or
moderate recovery (GOS). This is in accordance with the results of
other surgical series3 5 and our previous
study,2 in which 399 of 524 patients (76%) operated on
within 3 days after SAH had good or moderate recovery.
Symptomatic vasospasm, the need for permanent shunt
creation, size of the ruptured aneurysm, and Hunt and Hess
grade proved to be independent predictors of clinical outcome,
regardless of treatment modality. The initial effects of SAH have been
found to be the most important predictive factors of outcome also in
most surgical1 2 3 4 35 39 and in many
endovascular13 14 15 16 17 18 40 series.
Efficacy of Treatment
The aim of treatment is total occlusion of the aneurysm to
prevent rebleeding. Incompletely clipped aneurysms have a high
probability of growing neck remnants and rebleeding during
follow-up.41 42 43 44 45 46 It can be presumed that ruptured
aneurysms which are only partially coiled carry at least the
same risk for late rebleeding.42 No late rebleedings have
occurred among our study population, though many had small neck
remnants after initial treatment.
The long-term angiographic follow-up was not scheduled identically for both groups, because only the surgically treated patients with residual filling of the aneurysm were controlled. Rebleeding has recently been reported to affect 2.7% of patients (cumulatively over 10 years), even after complete clipping of the aneurysm.47 The estimated incidence of rupture increases to 0.38% to 0.79% per year in cases of incompletely clipped aneurysms.43 We did not include the completely clipped aneurysms in our angiographic follow-up protocol because the possible regrowth of aneurysmal remnants requires many years.41 43 45 46 47 48
The number of endovascularly treated aneurysms partly refilling on 1-year follow-up was relatively high (n=10). On the other hand, 7 of the endovascular aneurysmal remnants were spontaneously thrombosed on follow-up. These numbers, similar to other endovascular series,13 40 49 emphasize the unpredictable nature of these aneurysmal remnants. Regrowth has been shown to occur after as long as 2 years.50 Although incompletely coiled aneurysms might behave differently from incompletely clipped aneurysms due to some elasticity of the coil mass,11 a high (7.9%) rebleeding rate for aneurysms with an unstable occlusion has been reported during 3 years of follow-up.13
The final occlusion rate of the aneurysms was clearly improved
from the primary angiographic results after retreatment and crossover
treatment (Table 5
). The surgical treatment group reached an
86% rate of complete occlusion and a 12% rate of nearly complete
occlusion. This is less than rates reported by
others3 41 43 but may possibly be due to our extremely
strict criteria for evaluating the rate of angiographic obliteration.
In the patients treated only endovascularly and alive 12 months after
treatment, the primary total occlusion rate of 59% had improved to
77% at the 12-month angiography (n=34). Reembolization was performed
in 3patients, and refilling (n=6) or spontaneous thrombosis (n=6) of
the coiled aneurysm occurred in 12 cases (35%), emphasizing
the importance of long-term angiographic follow-up. When we compare our
primary occlusion rate in small aneurysms with a small neck
(total occlusion rate 61%) it is slightly lower than that in the
largest series reported (70.8%).17 23 Endovascular
treatment is rapidly evolving; remodeling technique,51 the
new 3-dimensional and stretch-resistant coils, and increasing
experience will hopefully improve the overall results.
Embolization of residual aneurysms had no morbidity or mortality, whereas additional surgical treatment resulted in death in 2 cases. The surgical difficulties after incomplete surgical treatment41 as well as in treatment of incompletely coiled aneurysms at a later stage18 23 52 53 are well known. Although safe re-coiling18 54 of an incompletely occluded aneurysm is not always possible, combined treatment can offer good results.18 52 53 54 55
Neuropsychological Outcome
The use of a robust clinical outcome scale (GOS) in outcome
evaluation of aneurysmal SAH does not reveal persistent
neuropsychological deficits. Subtle impairments of cognition and memory
have been detected in patients with good neurological
outcome,56 57 58 59 although some studies have failed to detect
these minor deficits.60 61
We did not detect any significant difference in the neuropsychological test results between treatment groups. However, the patients in both groups generally improved their performance between the 3- and 12-month assessments, whereas the clinical outcome evaluation failed to show any improvement, which indicates the value of neuropsychological evaluation. The severity of SAH itself causes impairments in cognitive function, which explains why the treatment groups showed similar patterns of impairment, as suggested by others.56
MRI of the Brain
MRI is a sensitive method for detecting and characterizing
permanent deficits in brain tissue as a consequence of SAH or
treatment. These findings do not necessarily correlate with
neurobehavioral functioning,62 although correlation of
cognitive impairment and localization of cerebral infarcts on CT after
clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms has been
shown.63
Superficial brain retraction injury was commonly seen in surgical
patients but showed no correlation with clinical outcome. Surgical
patients also showed significantly more ischemic lesions in the
parental artery territory of the ruptured aneurysm, but not at
remote locations. The clinical symptoms of vasospasm were equally
frequent in both treatment groups.23 These findings
suggest that surgical manipulation of the arteries does cause local
vasospasm that leads to ischemic deficits, but surgery itself
combined with rinsing of the basal cisterns neither produces nor
prevents general vasospasm, as previously suggested.33
Definitive diagnosis of vasospasm is difficult in unconscious patients.
The 3 deaths in Hunt and Hess grades III patients in the surgical
group (Table 2
) were not related to vasospasm.
Both the presence of an ischemic lesion in the parental artery territory and shunt-dependent hydrocephalus proved to be independent predictors of poorer clinical outcome. These findings, more common in surgical patients,23 did not lead to significantly worse outcome than after endovascular treatment; however, the clinical outcome could have been affected in a larger series of patients.
Conclusions
Endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured intracranial
aneurysms results in clinical and neuropsychological outcome
equal to the outcome of acute surgical clipping of the ruptured
aneurysm, thus providing a good alternative and sometimes
complementary method of treatment. Endovascular treatment is
significantly less-often associated with MRI-detectable brain injury, a
factor that must be weighed against the slightly poorer total occlusion
rate of the aneurysm and the need for repeated angiographic
controls. Endovascular treatment is suitable for a selected group of
patients, but its long-term efficacy in preventing rebleeding remains
unknown.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Learning and Memory
Memory was tested by the Wechsler Memory Scale.27
The memory quotient was calculated to assess short-term memory level.
Delayed recall from the Logical Memory Subtest27 and the
Visual Reproduction Subtest27 was asked 45 minutes
later. The scores were the number of recalled items for each subtest.
Nonverbal memory was also assessed by the Rey Complex
Figure
.25 The patient was asked to copy a complex
geometric figure as well as possible, and 45 minutes later the patient
was asked to reproduce as much of the figure as could be remembered.
The score was the number of recalled details.
Attention and Flexibility of Mental Processing and Psychomotor
Speed
The Stroop Test24 was used to evaluate sustained
attention and resistance to interference. In Form A, the subject was
asked to read aloud 50 color names printed in black and in Form B to
name the color of colored dots. In Form C, the subject was asked to
name the color of 50 words printed in a color different from the word
itself (interference condition). The scores were the time used to
complete each task. The Trail-Making Test29 was also used
to evaluate sustained attention, resistance to interference, and
response inhibition. In Part A, the subject was asked to draw a line
connecting consecutively numbered circles. In Part B, the subject had
to draw a line alternating between numbers1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 and
alphabets (AL). The scores were the times required to complete each
task. The Finger-Tapping test was used to assess simple psychomotor
speed. Tapping rate was determined over 10 seconds in 2 trials for each
hand. The scores are the means of both hands.
Received May 30, 2000; revision received July 17, 2000; accepted July 17, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Hernesniemi J, Vapalahti M, Niskanen M, Tapaninaho A, Kari A, Luukkonen M, Puranen M, Saari T, Rajpar M. One-year outcome in early aneurysm surgery: a 14 years experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1993;122:110.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Kassell NF, Torner JC, Jane JA, Haley EC Jr, Adams HP. The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery, part 2: surgical results. J Neurosurg. 1990;73:3747.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Kassell NF, Torner JC, Haley EC Jr, Jane JA, Adams HP, Kongable GL. The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery, part 1: overall management results. J Neurosurg. 1990;73:1836.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Saveland H, Hillman J, Brandt L, Edner G, Jakobsson KE, Algers G. Overall outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective study from neurosurgical units in Sweden during a 1-year period. J Neurosurg. 1992;76:729734.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Fogelholm R, Hernesniemi J, Vapalahti M. Impact of
early surgery on outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid
hemorrhage: a population-based study. Stroke. 1993;24:16491654.
7.
Schievink WI. Intracranial aneurysms.
N Engl J Med. 1997;336:2840.
8. Le Roux PD, Elliott JP, Downey L, Newell DW, Grady MS, Mayberg MR, Eskridge JM, Winn HR. Improved outcome after rupture of anterior circulation aneurysms: a retrospective 10-year review of 224 good-grade patients. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:394402.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
International Study of Unruptured Intracranial
Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial
aneurysms: risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention.
N Engl J Med. 1998;339:17251733.
10. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Dion J, Duckwiler G. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach, part 2: preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:814.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Latchaw RE. Acutely ruptured intracranial
aneurysm: should we treat with endovascular coils or with
surgical clipping? Radiology. 1999;211:306308.
12. Graves VB, Strother CM, Duff TA, Perl J II. Early treatment of ruptured aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: effect on subsequent bleeding. Neurosurgery. 1995;37:640647.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Byrne JV, Sohn MJ, Molyneux AJ, Chir B. Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:656663.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Raymond J, Roy D. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:12351245.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Richling B, Bavinzski G, Gross C, Gruber A, Killer M. Early clinical outcome of patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms treated by endovascular (GDC) or microsurgical techniques. Intervent Neuroradiol. 1995;1:1927.
16. Kuether TA, Nesbit GM, Barnwell SL. Clinical and angiographic outcomes, with treatment data, for patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: a single-center experience. Neurosurgery. 1998;43:10161025.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, Mawad M. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg. 1997;86:475482.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Malisch TW, Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, Gobin YP, Martin NA, Frazee JG. Intracranial aneurysms treated with the Guglielmi detachable coil: midterm clinical results in a consecutive series of 100 patients. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:176183.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Casasco AE, Aymard A, Gobin YP, Houdart E, Rogopoulos A, George B, Hodes JE, Cophignon J, Merland JJ. Selective endovascular treatment of 71 intracranial aneurysms with platinum coils. J Neurosurg. 1993;79:310.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, Rey A, Moret J.
Intracranial berry aneurysms: angiographic and clinical results
after endovascular treatment. Radiology. 1998;206:499510.
21. Eskridge JM, Song JK. Endovascular embolization of 150 basilar tip aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: results of the Food and Drug Administration multicenter clinical trial. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:8186.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Jennet B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. Lancet. 1975;1:480484.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Vanninen R, Koivisto T, Saari T, Hernesniemi J,
Vapalahti M. Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: acute
endovascular treatment with electrolytically detachable coils: a
prospective randomized study. Radiology. 1999;211:325336.
24. Golden C. Stroop Color and Word Test. Chicago, Ill: Stoerting; 1978.
25. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
26. Borkowski JG, Benton AL, Spreen O. Word fluency and brain damage. Neuropsychologia. 1967;5:135140.
27. Wechsler DA. Wechsler Memory Scale Manual. San Antonio, Tex: The Psychological Corporation; 1974.
28. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence ScaleRevised. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation. 1981.
29. Reitan RM. Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills. 1958;8:271276.
30. Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery. 1980;6:19.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, van der Graaf Y, van Rooij WJ,
Algra A. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization
with coils: a systematic review. Stroke. 1999;30:470476.
32. Bryan RN, Rigamonti D, Mathis JM. The treatment of acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms: endovascular therapy versus surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:18261830.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Gruber A, Ungersbock K, Reinprecht A, Czech T, Gross C, Bednar M, Richling B. Evaluation of cerebral vasospasm after early surgical and endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1998;42:258267.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Öhman J, Heiskanen O. Timing of operation for ruptured supratentorial aneurysms: a prospective randomized study. J Neurosurg. 1989;70:5560.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Peerless SJ, Hernesniemi JA, Gutman FB, Drake CG. Early surgery for ruptured vertebrobasilar aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1994;80:643649.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Jane JA, Winn HR, Richardson AE. The natural history of intracranial aneurysms: rebleeding rates during the acute and long term period and implication for surgical management. Clin Neurosurg. 1977;24:176184.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1968;28:1420.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Rinne J, Hernesniemi J, Niskanen M, Vapalahti M. Management outcome for multiple intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1995;36:3137.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Niskanen MM, Hernesniemi JA, Vapalahti MP, Kari A. One-year outcome in early aneurysm surgery: prediction of outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1993;123:2532.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Lempert TE, Malek AM, Halbach VV, Phatouros CC, Meyers
PM, Dowd CF, Higashida RT. Endovascular treatment of ruptured posterior
circulation cerebral aneurysms: clinical and angiographic
outcomes. Stroke. 2000;31:100110.
41. Drake CG, Friedman AH, Peerless SJ. Failed aneurysm surgery: reoperation in 115 cases. J Neurosurg. 1984;61:848856.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Drake CG, Peerless SJ, Hernesniemi JA. Complications of surgery for vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms and final comments. In: Surgery of Vertebrobasilar Aneurysms: London, Ontario, Experience on 1,767 Patients. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1996:300311.
43. Feuerberg I, Lindquist C, Lindqvist M, Steiner L. Natural history of postoperative aneurysm rests. J Neurosurg. 1987;66:3034.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Lin T, Fox AJ, Drake CG. Regrowth of aneurysm sacs from residual neck following aneurysm clipping. J Neurosurg. 1989;70:556560.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Giannotta SL, Litofsky NS. Reoperative management of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:387393.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. David CA, Vishteh AG, Spetzler RF, Lemole M, Lawton MT, Partovi S. Late angiographic follow-up review of surgically treated aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:396401.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Tsutsumi K, Ueki K, Usui M, Kwak S, Kirino T. Risk of
recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage after complete
obliteration of cerebral aneurysms. Stroke. 1998;29:25112513.
48. Ebina K, Suzuki M, Andoh A, Saitoh K, Iwabuchi T. Recurrence of cerebral aneurysm after initial neck clipping. Neurosurgery. 1982;11:764768.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49.
Cognard C, Weill A, Spelle L, Piotin M, Castaings L,
Rey A, Moret J. Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial
berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils.
Radiology. 1999;212:348356.
50. Mericle RA, Wakhloo AK, Lopes DK, Lanzino G, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Delayed aneurysm regrowth and recanalization after Guglielmi detachable coil treatment. J Neurosurg.. 1998;89:142145.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Moret J, Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, Rey A. The "remodelling technique" in the treatment of wide neck intracranial aneurysms: angiographic results and clinical follow-up in 56 cases. Intervent Neuroradiol. 1997;3:2135.
52. Gurian JH, Martin NA, King WA, Duckwiler GR, Guglielmi G, Vinuela F. Neurosurgical management of cerebral aneurysms following unsuccessful or incomplete endovascular embolization. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:843853.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Civit T, Auque J, Marchal JC, Bracard S, Picard L, Hepner H. Aneurysm clipping after endovascular treatment with coils: a report of eight patients. Neurosurgery. 1996;38:955960.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Horowitz M, Purdy P, Kopitnik T, Dutton K, Samson D. Aneurysm retreatment after Guglielmi detachable coil and nondetachable coil embolization: report of nine cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1999;44:712719.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Thielen KR, Nichols DA, Fulgham JR, Piepgras DG. Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms following incomplete clipping. J Neurosurg. 1997;87:184189.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Berry E, Jones RA, West CG, Brown JD. Outcome of subarachnoid haemorrhage: an analysis of surgical variables, cognitive and emotional sequelae related to SPECT scanning. Br J Neurosurg. 1997;11:378387.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Ogden JA, Mee EW, Henning M. A prospective study of impairment of cognition and memory and recovery after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1993;33:572586.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Hutter BO, Gilsbach JM. Which neuropsychological deficits are hidden behind a good outcome (Glasgow=I) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage? Neurosurgery. 1993;33:9991005.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59. Ljunggren B, Sonesson B, Saveland H, Brandt L. Cognitive impairment and adjustment in patients without neurological deficits after aneurysmal SAH and early operation. J Neurosurg. 1985;62:673679.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. McKenna P, Willison JR, Phil B, Lowe D, Neil-Dwyer G. Cognitive outcome and quality of life one year after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1989;24:361367.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
61. Bornstein RA, Weir BK, Petruk KC, Disney LB. Neuropsychological function in patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1987;21:651654.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62. Romner B, Sonesson B, Ljunggren B, Brandt L, Saveland H, Holtas S. Late magnetic resonance imaging related to neurobehavioral functioning after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1989;25:390396.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
63. Vilkki J, Holst P, Ohman J, Servo A, Heiskanen O. Cognitive deficits related to computed tomographic findings after surgery for a ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Neurosurgery. 1989;25:166172.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Gunnarsson, F.C. Tong, P. Klurfan, C.M. Cawley, and J.E. Dion Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes in 200 Consecutive Patients with Cerebral Aneurysm Treated with Hydrogel-Coated Coils AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2009; 30(9): 1657 - 1664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Bederson, E. S. Connolly Jr, H. H. Batjer, R. G. Dacey, J. E. Dion, M. N. Diringer, J. E. Duldner Jr, R. E. Harbaugh, A. B. Patel, and R. H. Rosenwasser Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association Stroke, March 1, 2009; 40(3): 994 - 1025. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Mustonen, T Koivisto, R Vanninen, T Hanninen, M Vapalahti, J Hernesniemi, J T Kuikka, and E Vanninen Heterogeneity of cerebral perfusion 1 week after haemorrhage is an independent predictor of clinical outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2008; 79(10): 1128 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Ng and N Kitchen Neurosurgery and pregnancy J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2008; 79(7): 745 - 752. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.K. Natarajan, L.N. Sekhar, B. Ghodke, G.W. Britz, D. Bhagawati, and N. Temkin Outcomes of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Microsurgical Clipping and Endovascular Coiling in a High-Volume Center AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 753 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H TAKAO, T NOJO, and K OHTOMO Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a decision analysis Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2008; 81(964): 299 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Bendel, T. Koivisto, M. Kononen, T. Hanninen, H. Hurskainen, T. Saari, M. Vapalahti, J. Hernesniemi, and R. Vanninen MR Imaging of the Brain 1 Year after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Randomized Study Comparing Surgical with Endovascular Treatment Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 543 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Campi, N. Ramzi, A. J. Molyneux, P. E. Summers, R. S.C. Kerr, M. Sneade, J. A. Yarnold, J. Rischmiller, and J. V. Byrne Retreatment of Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms in Patients Randomized by Coiling or Clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Stroke, May 1, 2007; 38(5): 1538 - 1544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Bendel, T. Koivisto, T. Hanninen, A. Kolehmainen, M. Kononen, H. Hurskainen, C. Pennanen, and R. Vanninen Subarachnoid hemorrhage is followed by temporomesial volume loss: MRI volumetric study. Neurology, August 22, 2006; 67(4): 575 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Redekop Microsurgical Clipping or Endovascular Coiling for Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1352 - 1353. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. van der Schaaf, A. Algra, M. J. Wermer, A. Molyneux, M. Clarke, J. van Gijn, and G. Rinkel Endovascular Coiling Versus Neurosurgical Clipping for Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 572 - 573. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Lafuente and R S Maurice-Williams Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the outcome of surgical treatment in experienced hands in the period prior to the advent of endovascular coiling J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2003; 74(12): 1680 - 1684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Berman, R. A. Solomon, S. A. Mayer, S. C. Johnston, and P. P. Yung Impact of Hospital-Related Factors on Outcome After Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2200 - 2207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Tuffiash, R. J. Tamargo, and A. E. Hillis Craniotomy for Treatment of Unruptured Aneurysms Is Not Associated With Long-Term Cognitive Dysfunction Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2195 - 2199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Vogel, R. Verreault, J.-F. Turcotte, M. Kiesmann, and M. Berthel Review Article. Intracerebral Aneurysms: A Review With Special Attention to Geriatric Aspects J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2003; 58(6): M520 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sluzewski, W. J. van Rooij, G. J. E. Rinkel, and D. Wijnalda Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with Detachable Coils: Long-term Clinical and Serial Angiographic Results Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 720 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Vanninen, H. Manninen, and A. Ronkainen Broad-Based Intracranial Aneurysms: Thrombosis Induced by Stent Placement AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2003; 24(2): 263 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Johnston, R. T. Higashida, D. L. Barrow, L. R. Caplan, J. E. Dion, G. Hademenos, L. N. Hopkins, A. Molyneux, R. H. Rosenwasser, F. Vinuela, et al. Recommendations for the Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Committee on Cerebrovascular Imaging of the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology Stroke, October 1, 2002; 33(10): 2536 - 2544. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |